Download
Abstract
Forecasts of infectious agents provide public health officials advanced warning about the intensity and timing of the spread of disease. Past work has found that accuracy and calibration of forecasts is weakest when attempting to predict an epidemic peak. Forecasts from a mechanistic model would be improved if there existed accurate information about the timing and intensity of an epidemic. We presented 3000 humans with simulated surveillance data about the number of incident hospitalizations from a current and two past seasons, and asked that they predict the peak time and intensity of the underlying epidemic. We found that in comparison to two control models, a model including human judgment produced more accurate forecasts of peak time and intensity of hospitalizations during an epidemic. Chimeric models have the potential to improve our ability to predict targets of public health interest which may in turn reduce infectious disease burden.
Citation
McAndrew, T., Gibson, G. C., Braun, D., Srivastava, A., & Brown, K. (2024). Chimeric Forecasting: An experiment to leverage human judgment to improve forecasts of infectious disease using simulated surveillance data. Epidemics, 47, 100756.
BibTeX
@article{mcandrew2024chimeric,
title={Chimeric Forecasting: An experiment to leverage human judgment to improve forecasts of infectious disease using simulated surveillance data},
author={McAndrew, Thomas and Gibson, Graham C and Braun, David and Srivastava, Abhishek and Brown, Kate},
journal={Epidemics},
volume={47},
pages={100756},
year={2024},
publisher={Elsevier}
}